Who will listen and who will not listen
See this table:
Will Not Listen
|
Will Listen
| |
1
|
What a message should do to the listener
|
What the listener does with the message
|
2
|
The listener will interpret what we say anyway
|
Listeners interpret messages in ways which make them feel comfortable and secure
|
3
|
Does the message attack heads-on the listeners attitudes?
|
Listener will defend and re-enforce any attitude we attack
|
4
|
We know the message is important
|
People will only pay attention to massages relevant to their circumstances and point of view.
|
5
|
Best listeners are the one have secure relationships
|
The best listeners are in insecure relationships
|
6
|
People will listen to us
|
People will listen to us, only if we listen to them
|
7
|
Simple communication will change people
|
People change if there is a combination of a new experience and communications
|
8
|
People may or may not accept change
|
People will more likely accept change if they are consulted before
|
9
|
Anyone, anywhere, anytime can deliver the message
|
The message will be interpreted in light of who delivers the message, when and where.
|
10
|
Make the message raise above our own internal conflicts
|
Communicators must first reconcile their own internal conflicts and doubts in order to be effective
|
The Meetup-geekese style
The container companies want to wow DevOps. And Developers, But
@joyent @tutum @docker @ClusterHQ @giantswarm Because if they don't understand, they will not use it. and they will not buy it
— Miha Ahronovitz (@myinnervoice) March 21, 2015
Most of the pitches I have seen are in a meetup-geekese style. Which is great, But with a few exceptions (like the CTO of Docker) no one container star bothered to do a final edit using the table above.This is what we do in Ahrono Associates. |
Comments